Mathemagix

[Grégoire Lecerf <address@concealed>]

> I agree with your point of view to replace list by an
> array type, for the syntax [...] in the interpretor.
> We should have a structure which allows to store (and to access 
> efficiently) a sequence of data (of the same type) as returned by some 
> algorithms (example: sequence of roots of a polynomial).
> It has not necessarely the properties of vectors (ie with +, -, . 
> operators).
> Thus we should be able to have both arrays and vectors.
>   - arrays provided by basix with the semantic of sequences,
>   - vectors provided by algebr*ix with the semantic of elements of a 
> vector space. Conversion from arrays to vectors should be available
> naturally/automatically if the value type is a ring type.
Ok for me.